The important things

AMP NEWS: My YouTube video of the week's top stories, humorously presented from a Catholic perspective!

archives of the funny

Caption of the Day

website of the month

CatholicVote.com

 book of the month

Render Unto Caesar

CD of the month

St. Michael's Christmas

 Pa•pist: n. A Catholic who is a strong advocate of the papacy.

 

 "Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them." - Ephesians 5:11

AmP 2.0 features

recent posts

 

comments

AmP videos

twitter

AddThis Feed Button

facebook

subscribe

AddThis Feed Button

bookmark

 

email updates


AmP Countdown: Time left to vote for me ("Thomas Peters") in the 2008 Student Blogging Contest: 2008-11-20 23:59:59 GMT-05:00


Friday, March 31, 2006

Bruskewitz - 1, Ewers - 0

UPDATE: Bruskewitz - 0?, Particular Church Law - 1?

The premier story for tonight:

Bishop Bruskewitz shoots back at National Review Board

Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz of Lincoln, Nebraska, has responded sharply to criticism from the US bishops' National Review Board about his refusal to cooperate with the Board's "audit" of diocesan plans for implementing national guidelines on sex-abuse programs.

Bishop Bruskewitz released this statement on March 31:

"Some woman named Patricia O'Donnell Ewers, who is the Chair of something called "A National Review Board for the Protection of Children and Young People", has said that her Board "calls for strong fraternal correction of the Diocese of Lincoln." The Diocese of Lincoln has nothing to be corrected for, since the Diocese of Lincoln is and has always been in full compliance with all laws of the Catholic Church and with all civil laws. Furthermore, Ewers and her Board have no authority in the Catholic Church and the Diocese of Lincoln does not recognize them as having any significance.

It is well known that some of the members of Ewers' Board are ardent advocates of partial birth abortion, other abortions, human cloning, and other moral errors. It is understandable then how such persons could dislike the Diocese of Lincoln, which upholds the moral teaching of the Catholic Church.

The words attributed to Ewers seem to confirm the suspicion that the members of her Board are unfamiliar with Catholic teachings, Catholic ecclesiology, and even the basic rudiments of the Catholic Catechism. Rather than concerning themselves with the Diocese of Lincoln about which they appear completely ignorant, Ewers and her colleagues would occupy themselves in a better way by learning something about the Catholic religion and the traditions and doctrines and laws of the Catholic Church.

The Diocese of Lincoln does not see any reason for the existence of Ewers and her organization.

Gerald, Dom (and now Diogenes) give their commentary.

UPDATE: Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam has found the statement that evoked Bishop Brukewitz' response:

In just three years, dioceses/eparchies have worked extremely hard to address the issue of clergy sexual abuse. This conclusion is strongly supported by the audit results.

It disheartens the Board, however, that the bishop of the Diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska, and the eparch of the Eparchy of Newton for Melkite Catholics in Newton, Massachusetts, have refused to participate in the audit process, and the Board calls for strong fraternal correction in these refusals.

Though their governance authority is fully understood by the Board, nonetheless, these refusals go against all of the efforts of the Church to be open and transparent in addressing child protection and reaching out to victims to help with their healing.

[my underlining]

[link to the full original document]

|

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home