AmP twitter updates

Twitter Updates

    archives of the funny

    Caption of the Day/PPOTD

    website of the month

    A.P.Project

     book of the month

    Our Lady of Guadalupe

     Pa•pist: n. A Catholic who is a strong advocate of the papacy.

     

     "Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them." - Ephesians 5:11

    AmP 2.0 features

    recent posts

     

    comments

    AmP videos

     

    AddThis Feed Button

    facebook

    subscribe

    AddThis Feed Button

    bookmark

     

    email updates


    AmP Countdown: Time left to demand that Congress make health care reform pro-life: 2009-11-07 18:00:00 GMT-05:00


    Thursday, November 30, 2006

    Beautiful photo of the day


    Photo caption: Pope Benedict XVI blesses a blind child as he visits the sixth century Byzantine monument St. Sofia (Aya Sofya), once a church in the Byzantinian era which was converted to a mosque by the Ottoman empire and is now a museum, in Istanbul November 30, 2006. (Tolga Adanali/Pool/Reuters)

    Well, hopefully this won't upset anybody. After all, numerous radical muslims have said they would be watching the Pope carefully to make sure that he doesn't make any religious signs during his visit to the ex-Christian Church ... some even warned that he would try to conduct a Mass inside it.

    Not like that wouldn't have been cool.

    Your PPOTD! - Thursday, Nov. 30

    Early baptism fonts tended more towards expansiveness than ornateness.

    AmP follows the Pope to Turkey: Day Three

    Thursday could well be the most important day of the Pope's journey, with visits to the Hagia Sophia and Blue Mosque. It is also the busiest.

    Today's schedule of events:

  • 1st: Divine Liturgy at the Patriarchal Church of St. George in the Phanar
    Address of the Holy FatherJoint Declaration [Address of the Holy Father/ Joint Declaration]
  • 2nd: Visit to the Museum of Saint Sofia
  • 3rd: Moment of prayer in the Armenian Apostolic Cathedral and meeting with H.B. Patriarch Mesrob II [Greeting of the Holy Father]
  • 4th: Meeting with H.E. the Syrian Orthodox Metropolitan
  • 5th: Meeting with the Grand Rabbi of Turkey
  • 6th: Meeting and dinner with the members of the Catholic Episcopal Conference
  • Speeches of Pope Benedict:

    News stories, set #4 (random):

    News stories, set #3 (the Pope's visit to a mosque):

    News stories, set #2 (most provide video):

    News stories, set #1:

    More Pictures of Benedict and Bartholomew: here & here.

    [You Caption!] [Pictures: Pope Benedict in the Cathedral of St. George]

    The essential links:

    [photo caption: AP photo]

    Wednesday, November 29, 2006

    Sticky: AmP coverage of the Pope's visit to Turkey

    AmP follows the Pope to Turkey (newest posts at top, older posts will be removed):

    For blog posts not related to the Pope's apostolic journey to Turkey, please scroll down. Thanks!

    Pictures: Pope Benedict in the Cathedral of St. George

    Here's the visuals we've all been waiting for - leave it to the Orthodox!





    [photo credits: REUTERS/Kai Pfaffenbach (TURKEY)]

    You Caption! Wednesday, Nov. 19th

    I've already done my PPOTD (Papist-Picture-of-the-Day), but this just got posted on the wire:

    [photo: AP Photo/Muammer Baskanl]

    Update: Continuing coverage of the Pope's trip to Turkey available here.

    Your PPOTD! Wednesday, Nov. 19th

    Staff shortages reached critical levels by the time for the preparation of the gifts.
    [photo: AP Photo/Kenan Cimenl]

    AmP follows the Pope to Turkey: Day Two

    Wednesday is a low-key day in the Pope's schedule - probably to allow a bit of rest before he faces the busy events of tomorrow.

    We're also beginning to see encouraging signs that the Pope's message is being acceptedby the people of Turkey.

    Today's schedule (all times EST):

  • 1st: Holy Mass - [Homily of the Holy Father]
  • 2nd: Moment of prayer in the Patriarchal Church of St. George in the Phanar and private meeting with H.H. Bartholomew I - [Greeting of the Holy Father]
  • Speeches of Pope Benedict:

    Pictures: Pope Benedict in the Cathedral of St. George

    News stories, set #2:

    News stories, set #1:

    The essential links:

    [Pope Benedict XVI waves at the end of a Mass at the House of the Virgin Mary in Ephesus, near Selcuk, Turkey, Wednesday, Nov. 29, 2006. It is believed that this house is the last residence of the Virgin Mary. The Pope is on the second day of his four-day trip to Turkey. In the background at left is the pontiff's personal aide Rev. Georg Gaenswein. (AP Photo/Patrick Hertzog, Pool)]

    Video: The Word with Colbert: "Ecu-menace"

    Not the funniest or most original Colbert, but still Colbert:



    h/t: CVSTOS FIDEI

    Get your Pope Calendar! Read all about it!

    Domini Sumus posts the details for how you can order your Pope Calendar ... and it sure beats paying $30-$60 (or more) on eBay!

    "The real calendar can be ordered directly from the publisher by e-mailing abbonamenti@stpauls.it or vpc@stpauls.it. Send your request and they will send you the price and the online ordering form."

    Tuesday, November 28, 2006

    LifeSiteNews headlines, Nov. 27-28th

    LifeSiteNews:

    Bp. Carlson underwent preventative surgery today, asks for prayers

    From the Saginaw Catholic Times:
    Saginaw Bishop Robert J. Carlson will undergo surgery on Tuesday, Nov. 28, to remove a section of his colon. There is no cancer in the area at the present time but there is some unusual cellular activity that could develop in the future. The bishop has chosen to have this preventative surgery done now and hopes to resume a normal schedule sometime in January.

    ...

    "While there is no cancer, the doctors I have spoken to, for a sceond opinion, have told me it is a real gift to have this knoweldge and to take action before any cancer is present. I see this as a real blessing from God and I go into the surgery very positive," said Bishop Carlson.

    Bishop Carlson, 62, asks parishoners in the 11-county Saginaw Diocese for their prayers for a successful surgery and a rapid recovery. Cards may be sent to: Bishop Robert J. Carlson, Diocese of Saginaw, 5800 Weiss St., Saginaw, MI 48063.
    Update: More from the Saginaw diocese:

    Bishop Robert J. Carlson is recovering from an elective surgery he had this morning to remove a portion of his colon.

    While Bishop Carlson has been diagnosed as "cancer free," doctors had recommend recently that he undergo the preventative operation after discovering some "unusual cellular activity" that they feared could have the ability to turn into cancer in the future.

    "The surgery was successful and Bishop Carlson is resting comfortably. He remains in good health," Chancellor Nancy J. Werner said. "He has asked me to express his deep gratitude for those of you who have prayed for his well-being. He would appreciate the continued prayers of the faithful and continues to offer his own intentions for the people of the Diocese of Saginaw."

    House to vote on abortion/fetal pain disclosure bill next week

    CNA Reports:

    The House of Representatives will hold the first-ever vote next week on a measure that would inform women considering an abortion after 20 weeks gestation that their baby will feel intense pain as a result of the abortion, reported LifeNews.com [here].

    The bill also requires abortion practitioners to offer the mother a chance to give the baby anesthesia beforehand.

    Rep. Chris Smith, a pro-life New Jersey Republican, is the lead sponsor of the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act (H.R. 6099), and 93 members of the House have signed on as co-sponsors.

    The measure came about after the debate in Congress on the federal partial-birth abortion ban. Witnesses testified that unborn children past 20 weeks gestation feel excruciating pain during the course of an abortion.

    The House will consider the bill under the "Suspension Calendar" which means the legislation needs a two-thirds vote in order to pass.

    Whether or not the bill passes, consideration of the measure provides pro-life lawmakers an opportunity to launch a national discussion on the pain babies feel during abortions.

    Dr. Kanwaljeet Anand of the University of Arkansas Medical Center has said an unborn child's ability to feel pain "will develop sometime during the second trimester and by the third trimester the pain system is completely functional."

    A British study, published in the Journal of Neuroscience by a team from University College London, came to the same conclusion. [source.]

    LifeSiteNews adds this action item:
    Contact your member of Congress and urge strong support for the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act. You can call any member at 1-202-224-3121 or go to http://www.house.gov/ to look up your representative.
    Related: Pro-Life Group Urges Congress to Back Abortion-Fetal Pain Legislation

    What a world where Doctors ask women, "Would you like us to give your fetus a dose of anesthesia so it doesn't feel as much pain when we kill it?"

    Meanwhile, Ann Furendi, the head of Britain's leading abortion agency, wants us to think that "abortion is seen as a more responsible response to being a victim of uncontrolled fertility" by an increasing number of women in the U.K.

    Not surprisingly, a survey her agency recently commissioned supports her opinion that laws in the U.K. should be changed to make abortion easier. You know, because otherwise abortion won't continue to "lose its stigma."

    Now that's an odd choice of phrase when you think about it.

    Your PPOTD! - Tuesday, Nov. 28

    “So if I grew a beard this long, would you call me Santa?”

    (submitted by a seminarian friend of mine.)

    [photo: AP Photo/Patrick Hertzog, Pool]

    AmP advance movie review: The Nativity Story

    I had the privilege of attending an advanced screening of New Line Cinema’s The Nativity Story this evening. I'm excited about the movie for several reasons, one of which being that if it is successful in theaters we could witness our hopes come true for a renaissance in biblical films. However, while I found many good and praiseworthy elements in this movie, I also think it lacks some of the polish, direction and wholeness it could have had.

    First, the many good things in the movie. The story, on the whole, is extremely faithful to the biblical account of the events it portrays (the prophesy made to Zechariah through the flight into Egypt). The additions the movie makes are also, on the whole, well within the realm of what reputable historical scholarship tells us about the situation in Israel during the time of Christ’s birth. The movie is liberal with its quotations from scripture, and integrates the relevant passages seamlessly into the lives and onto the lips of its characters.

    Again, the historical accuracy is top-notch. Really, Hollywood has gotten the creation of lifelike and comprehensive sets and costumes down to a fine science, and I think one of the best things the movie does is remind its viewer just how real - real in all the little details - is the way of life that the Bible presents to us. One gets a very full glimpse at what life at that time was like. Frequently passed-over details of Mary’s life (such as the shame she would have probably experienced at the hands of her village for being pregnant and not married) comprise the real drama and exposition of the movie. In other words, what lies tucked beneath the verses or given brief mention in the gospel narratives receives a more proper treatment in the onscreen dramatization. And in that sense, this is a movie that will help one get in to the proper Christmas mindset – it promotes meditations upon the events of and surrounding the Incarnation.

    The possibilities for dramatizing other biblical stories and events are staggering. It should be remembered, biblical stories were the subject of “mystery plays” and other dramatic retellings for hundreds of years, and they also used to be the subject of many Hollywood big budget dramas (The Ten Commandments, and many others). With Hollywood’s current lack of ability to pen worthwhile original storylines for its movies, hopefully we’ll see more big-name studios going to the bible for their dramatic inspiration. They could do much worse, and have.

    But now a couple of the flaws (or more softly, insufficiencies) I found. The movie seems undecided which way it wants to go. On the one hand it wants the deep drama associated with presenting one of the most incredible events in human history, on the other hand the movie is so scared of coming across too heavy that it finds itself obligated to sprinkle (and sometimes spray) comedic relief wherever it can. The Three Wise men, for instance, end up acting more like the Three Stooges than anything else. The looks and reactions of the main characters to the difficulty of their situation and the uncertainty of their future more often provoked nervous (and heartfelt) laughs from the audience than concern. Granted, there are many poignant moments in the movie, and nothing can draw tears like seeing the story of Jesus Christ’s birth portrayed on the big screen with Hollywood’s full light and sound magic. But nevertheless, the constant switching between sadness and slapstick was a bit jarring, and not as polished as it could have been.

    Second, the movie’s portrayals of Elizabeth and Mary giving birth – of course a central part of the plot – were a bit too intense to make it an easy family movie choice. Added to this fact the decision to begin the movie with a rather frightening episode from the slaying of the infants, a few scenes of crucifixion, and a young girl being dragged off by the Romans for a future of forced prostitution, and I’m left in a quandary. Did New Line want this to be the perfect family holiday movie? If so, then why all the labor screams, primitive birthing techniques and babies being put under the sword? In the movie’s quest for realism and dramatic impact I think they might have unwittingly passed over the boundaries of what most Christian parents will probably want their younger children seeing, at least if they want to postpone giving their children the full explanation for where babies come from, what crucifixion looks like and what Romans do to the daughters of Jewish peasants who don’t pay their taxes.

    Sadly, the characterization of Mary I found to be rather shallow and unsatisfying (in contrast to Joseph, who comes off much better). While some of the attributes we classically ascribe to Mary can be seen (introspection, patience, kindness), the general impression the movie gives of Mary is rather one-dimensional. Now, I understand that capturing Mary in all her complexity and richness is a tall order, but still, Mary’s introspection more often felt like youthful petulance and her patience more like apathy. But perhaps my opinion on this will change after I see the movie again. There is one very beautiful scene where she offers the baby Jesus to one of the shepherds in the stable. I saw it as a wonderful example of Mary always wishing to bring humanity to her Son. And I guess one could argue that there are enough little moments such as that which go far in giving Mary her full due as the most blessed of creation.

    I promised myself in advance to keep my review under a thousand words, so I’ll cut my comments off here. I’d say once again that I did enjoy the movie, and would recommend it to others (with the reservation about small children I’ve mentioned). The movie could have been far, far worse, and I am infinitely thankful that I am only left to pointing out small deficiencies instead of bemoaning a problematic movie that could lead people astray.

    The Nativity Story is just the beginning, and I hope there will be many other movies like it in the future that pick up where it left off in retelling us the greatest story ever told.

    AmP rating: 4 out of 5.

    NB: The advance showing I attended was organized by the Maximus Group and Holy Trinity Apostolate, whom I heartily thank for their good efforts.

    AmP follows the Pope to Turkey: Day One

    Today's schedule (all times EST):
    • 2 AM: Departure from Leonardo Da Vinci International Airport of Rome/Fiumicino to Ankara
    • 6AM: Arrival at Esemboga International Airport [in Turkey]
    • then Visit to the Ataturk Mausoleum
    • then Welcome ceremony and courtesy visit to the President of the Republic
    • then Meeting with the Vice Prime Minister
    • then Meeting with the President of Religious Affairs [with Papal address]
    • then Meeting with the Diplomatic Corps [with Papal address]
    Speeches of Pope Benedict:
    Schedule for tomorrow (Wednesday):
    News stories, set #3:
    News stories, set #2:

    News stories, set #1:

    The essential links:

    [top photo credit: Turkish woman walks past the Kocatepe mosque in Ankara. Turkey urged Pope Benedict XVI to make his first trip to a Muslim country a "turning point" in relations between Islam and Christianity, as Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan finally agreed to meet the pontiff. (AFP/Dimitar Dilkoff)]

    Monday, November 27, 2006

    Your PPOTD! - Monday, Nov. 27

    "The Holy Spirit and Bl. John XIII carefully plan out the seating arrangements for those invited to accept the spirit of peace and truth this week in Turkey."
    [full caption: A man walks pass by a statue of Pope John XXIII as he carries chairs as part of the preparations for the upcoming pope visit at the St. Esprit Cathedral, the cathedral of the holy spirit, in Istanbul, Turkey, Monday, Nov. 27, 2006. The Pope will arrive in Turkey, his first visit to a Muslim country as pontiff, on Tuesday Nov. 28, and will hold a mass in the cathedral on Friday, Dec. 1. (AP Photo/Bela Szandelszky)]

    AmP follows the Pope to Turkey: One Day To Go

    From this morning's VIS:
    After praying the Angelus with the thousands of pilgrims gathered in St. Peter's Square, the Pope recalled how tomorrow, Tuesday, he begins his apostolic trip to Turkey where, between November 28 and December 1, he will visit Ankara, Ephesus and Istanbul.

    "From this moment," he said, "I would like to send my cordial greetings to the dear Turkish people, so rich in history and culture. To that people, and to their representatives, I extend sentiments of respect and sincere friendship."

    Benedict XVI also mentioned the "deep emotion" he felt at having the opportunity to meet the country's "small Catholic community, which is ever present in my heart, and to unite myself fraternally with the Orthodox Church for the Feast of St. Andrew the Apostle," on November 30.

    "I trustingly follow the footsteps of my venerated predecessors, Paul VI and John Paul II, and I invoke the celestial protection of Blessed John XXIII who for ten years was apostolic delegate in Turkey and nourished great affection and respect for that country."

    The Holy Father concluded his remarks by asking everyone to accompany him "with prayer, that this pilgrimage may bring the fruits that God desires."
    Some essential links (thanks, Amy!):

    [top photo caption: Riot police officers stand guard in front of the sixth century Byzantine monument of St. Sophia (Ayasofya) as police take high security measures in the old city in Istanbul on the eve of Pope Benedict 's visit to Turkey, November 27, 2006. Protesters displayed their long petition with thousands of signatures to demand the Ayasofya to be converted into a mosque as it was in the Ottoman empire era. St. Sophia (Ayasofya), now a museum, is a controversial site where Pope Benedict XVI is expected to visit during his trip to Turkey this week. REUTERS/Fatih Saribas] ... click here for a slideshow of related images.

    Update:

    Better than Wheaties, stronger than Mountain Dew

    Need to start your week on the right foot?
    From the Ironic Catholic (who else?)

    Sunday, November 26, 2006

    LifeSiteNews headlines, Nov. 26th

    LifeSiteNews:

    "Popemobile gives way to armoured car on visit to 'minefield'"

    The UK Times reports:

    The Vatican is so anxious about the Pope's safety during his trip to Turkey this week that it has vetoed use of the traditional "Popemobile".

    Instead, Pope Benedict XVI will travel in an armour-plated car, with several similar vehicles used as decoys, Joaquin Navarro-Valls, the former papal spokesman, said.

    Officials have also drawn up contingency plans for him to wear a bulletproof vest beneath his papal vestments as Turkish authorities mount a huge security operation including rooftop snipers, special forces, helicopters and navy speedboats.

    Before his first visit to a Muslim country, the Pope tried to defuse further protests yesterday, sending "cordial greetings" of "esteem and sincere friendship" to "the dear Turkish people" when he addressed pilgrims from his window above St Peter's Square during Angelus prayers.

    Papal aides confirmed that, in a conciliatory gesture to Muslims, the Pope had altered his official programme to include a visit to the Blue Mosque, or Sultanahmet, in Istanbul.

    ...

    Cardinal Walter Kasper, the head of the pontifical Council for Christian Unity, one of five cardinals accompanying the Pope, conceded that the trip had become a "minefield".

    Behind the scenes Vatican and Italian security forces have planned for the worst, with agents joining Turkish police in checking security arrangements in Ankara, Istanbul and Ephesus, the main stops on the Pope's tour.

    Video surveillance cameras have been installed around key buildings, including the Holy See embassy in Ankara, where the Pope will stay on the first night of his trip after paying respects at the Mausoleum of Ataturk. Turkish police appealed for restraint at planned protests, saying that they could harm the image of Turkey.

    While I'm happy to hear that these precautions (and many more, I'm sure) are in the works, it is deeply disturbing to see how much needs to be done and how palpable is the danger to our Holy Father. On this trip there is no such thing as "ensuring the Pontiff's safety." There simply isn't.

    After all, what suicidal Islamic terrorist wouldn't expect himself to be acclaimed by so many in his religion if he were to assasinate the Pope? It is this warped frame of mind that is especially disturbing on the eve of the trip.

    Today is the first day of the KoC's "Spiritual Pilgrimage with Pope Benedict XVI" to pray for his safety and the success of his mission. I'll be praying it and urge fellow papist readers to do the same:

    Heavenly Father, from whom every family in heaven and on earth takes its name, we humbly ask that you sustain, inspire, and protect your servant, Pope Benedict XVI, as he goes on pilgrimage to Turkey – a land to which St. Paul brought the Gospel of your Son; a land where once the Mother of your Son, the Seat of Wisdom, dwelt; a land where faith in your Son’s true divinity was definitively professed. Bless our Holy Father, who comes as a messenger of truth and love to all people of faith and good will dwelling in this land so rich in history. In the power of the Holy Spirit, may this visit of the Holy Father bring about deeper ties of understanding, cooperation, and peace among Roman Catholics, the Orthodox, and those who profess Islam. May the prayers and events of these historic days greatly contribute both to greater accord among those who worship you, the living and true God, and also to peace in our world so often torn apart by war and sectarian violence.

    We also ask, O Heavenly Father, that you watch over and protect Pope Benedict and entrust him to the loving care of Mary, under the title of Our Lady of Fatima, a title cherished both by Catholics and Muslims. Through her prayers and maternal love, may Pope Benedict be kept safe from all harm as he prays, bears witness to the Gospel, and invites all peoples to a dialogue of faith, reason, and love. We make our prayer through Christ, our Lord.
    Amen.

    Update: Dom discusses an unconfirmed report that Turkish forces have defeated an attempt to kill Cardinal Kasper.

    Update 2: Diogenes reminds us of this, from the Enchiridion of Indulgences:

    A partial indulgence is granted to the Christian faithful who, in a spirit of filial devotion, devoutly recite any duly approved prayer for the Supreme Pontiff (e.g., the Oremus pro Pontifice):

    V. Let us pray for our Pontiff, Pope Benedict XVI.

    R. May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and bless him upon earth, and deliver him not to the will of his enemies.

    Hagia Sophia shaping to be the focal point of drama

    Amid all the protests, a constant theme is coming up again and again: how the Pope acts during his visit to the Hagia Sophia. For instance, this article from the U.K. Times describing the 25,000 person protest that was held today in Turkey:
    The loudest boos, however, are reserved for references to the Pope’s proposed visit to Saint Sophia, the magnificent Byzantine basilica where Mehmed the Conqueror prayed after he took the city for the Ottoman Empire in 1453. It remained as a mosque until the Turkish Government turned it into a museum in the 1920s, to the annoyance of Islamists. If the Pope prays or so much as crosses himself when he enters the vast domed building, he will have staked a claim on the place, the protesters say.

    More on the embarassment these protests are to Turkey's EU hopes:
    Away from the scene, however, rather than complaining about the visit, secularist columnists have been upbraiding the Government about the mixed messages it has given the Pope and the lost opportunity to show that Turkey, a European Union candidate, is part of the Western world rather than a remote Islamic outpost.

    "Movie about birth of Jesus premieres at Vatican" - AP

    Sounds like a rather noneventful screening. And that isn't a bad thing.

    Movie about birth of Jesus premieres at Vatican - AP

    I'm seeing it tomorrow, and hope to post a review of it soon after. So check back!

    Update: Fr. John of WDTPRS attended the Vatican premier and has posted his review here.

    Video: One of the things money can't buy...

    Hopefully the people of Turkey will choose to share in the same spirit displayed by these youth:



    (I know the folks who put together this video and am always impressed with their work.)

    25,000 Protest Pope's Visit to Turkey

    (photo caption: A Turkish woman, wearing a headband that reads:"The ignorant and sneaky pope who insulted Islam and our Prophet should not come to Turkey", chants Islamic slogans during an anti-pope rally in Istanbul, Turkey, Sunday, Nov. 26, 2006. Thousands of Turks gathered in an Istanbul square to protest against the upcoming visit of Pope Benedict XVI, planned for Tuesday, to this predominantly [over 99%] Muslim country. [AP Photo/Murad Sezer])

    From the Associated Press:

    More than 25,000 people joined demonstrations Sunday against Pope Benedict XVI's upcoming visit, police said.

    The demonstration was the largest anti-pope protest so far ahead of Benedict's arrival Tuesday for a four-day visit, his first as pope to a predominantly Muslim country. Some 4,000 police backed by riot trucks, armored vehicles and helicopters monitored the protest as the crowds grew.

    The protest was organized by a pro-Islamic political party called Felicity whose leaders have said they were offended by Benedict's comments in September linking violence and Islam.

    BBC's coverage.

    Interesting rumors about the Pope's visit to the Hagia Sophia:

    And the eight minutes he [the Pope] is to spend in the cavernous St Sophia on Thursday afternoon will be watched and weighed for signals of the Vatican's true intent towards Turkey and, more crucially, the world's Muslims.

    Will the pontiff pray at the place the Turks call Ayasofya and the Greeks know as Hagia Sophia? Will he genuflect? Or quietly reconsecrate the shrine? He is likely, say those in the know, to cross himself as he enters the museum. The risk is that Benedict will send Turkey's Muslims and much of the Islamic world into paroxysms of fury if there is any perception that he is trying to re-appropriate a Christian centre. [source]

    "Pope death threats put Turkey on high alert" - U.K. Telegraph

    More glum news:

    An army of snipers, riot police, secret agents and bomb disposal experts has been mobilised for the Pope's four-day visit to Turkey. Naval units will patrol the Bosphorus armed with machine guns after warnings to police and security services that the life of Benedict XVI may be threatened by Islamic extremists after he arrives on Tuesday.

    Celalettin Cerrah, the police chief in Istanbul, said that the city would have maximum security and warned that he would "call for reinforcements from nearby cities" if needed. Fears within the Vatican, which has been making preparations on the ground for the past month, were heightened when a man lunged at Archbishop Pierluigi Celata, the former papal ambassador to Turkey, who was on a advance scouting mission in his Catholic robes. [More...]

    Saturday, November 25, 2006

    Everything you need in advance of the Pope's trip to Turkey

    ... has been carefully compiled by Christopher Blosser of The Benedict Blog.

    Friday, November 24, 2006

    3 CWNews headlines (More absent turkey leaders, blunt words from Benedict, Christians in Turkey)

    CWNews:
    • Christian flight from Turkey has halted, prelate reports: [no, not "flight" as in airplanes but as in "escape for persecution"] ... "Cardinal Daoud will be a member of the delegation traveling to Turkey with the Holy Father, along with four other cardinals: Tarcisio Bertone, the Secretary of State; Walter Kasper, the president of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity; Paul Poupard, the president of the Pontifical Council for Culture; and Roger Etchegaray, a retired Vatican official who has frequently served as a special representative of the Holy See in delicate diplomatic circumstances."
    • Blunt papal words for Anglican leader: "Today, however, there are "strains and difficulties" in the relationship [between Catholics and Anglicans], the Pope observed-- adding that there are strains within the Anglican communion as well. The source of these problems, the Pope continued, are recent trends in Anglican thought and practice "especially concerning the ordained ministry and certain moral teachings." He was clearly referring to the Anglican decisions on homosexuality and on the ordination of women. The Pope concluded his blunt appraisal of current tensions by expressing his "fervent hope that the Anglican Communion will remain grounded in the Gospels and the apostolic tradition."
    • Declare Islam peaceful, Turkish leader urges Pope: "Meanwhile the country's foreign minister, Abdullah Gul, has added his name to the list of government officials who will be unavailable to meet with Pope Benedict. The foreign minister explained that he will be attending a meeting of NATO leaders in Estonia. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has already announced his plans to be at the NATO meeting during the Pope's visit. Vatican officials had downplayed the significance of the premier's absence, saying that they were always aware of Erdogan's plans to be in Estonia. But organizers of the papal visit had expected a meeting with the foreign minister. Pope Benedict is still scheduled to meet with Turkey's President Necdet Sezer on the first evening of his stay in the country. The Turkish head of state will not meet the papal plane on his arrival, however. Turkish officials have consistently minimized the importance of the papal visit."

    B16 might visit mosque while in Turkey

    At least that's the AFP buzz:

    ROME (AFP) - A plan for Pope Benedict XVI to visit Istanbul's Blue Mosque is "under consideration" by the Vatican and Turkish authorities in the last days before his trip to Turkey, the Vatican said.

    The pope's spokesman Federico Lombardi confirmed rumours that the Pope is considering adding the mosque to his itinerary in recognition of Turkey's majority religion.

    He would likely tour the mosque on Thursday, when he is already scheduled to visit the sixth-century Byzantine Hagia Sophia Church, located a few hundred metres away.

    ...

    Benedict would be the second pope known to have visited a mosque, following John Paul II's trip to the Omeyyades mosque in Damascus.

    What we have here, at the Vatican, is a failure to communicate

    From noted Vatican reporter Sandro Magister:

    This Is the Vatican. Communications Have Been Interrupted

    Benedict XVI speaks to the world. But his words reach the general public with great difficulty – and sometimes not at all. Here’s what isn’t working in the communication system that should assist the pope

    [a quotation from the article:]

    "Pope Joseph Ratzinger doesn't use a computer – he writes in his miniscule handwriting the addresses and homilies most important to him, or dictates them, or improvises without providing anything written ahead of time. To transcribe, translate, and bring his words to an audience as vast as the world is not easy, but it is what Benedict XVI expects from the Vatican communication apparatus. It is an essential objective for a pope who is a “doctor of the Church."

    ...

    Not even the basic work of translation is functioning, even in a state as multilingual as the Vatican is.

    For example, the French and Portuguese translations of the papal lecture in Regensburg on September 12 (4) – the most famous and extensively discussed document of this pontificate – appeared on the Vatican’s website 35 days later. The Spanish translation came after 43 days. The Arabic version, prepared by the secretariat of state in mid-September and immediately distributed in the chancelleries of Muslim countries, is still not available to the general public. There are still a few steps left before it can be brought to the online desk.

    Another interesting point made in the article is the huge operating deficits of L'Osservatore Romano and Vatican Radio. The former at 4.6 million euros in 2005, the latter at 23.5 million euros.

    LifeSiteNews headlines, Nov. 24th (delayed)

    LifeSiteNews:

    Sure the Pope isn't attending the Nativity Story screening, but why?

    It's not because the "Catholic Church is embarassed" about the unwed pregnancy of the 16-yr-old who plays Mary in the film, as shelray of C-L-S explains, but rather because the Pope is getting ready to travel to Turkey. And I'd imagine that every spare moment of his time is being spent in prayer, preparation and ... well, prayer.

    Protests in Turkey - 3 days to go

    The nasty side of the anti-Pope protests are beginning to be visible in media coverage:

    Turkish young women walk past posters advertising an anti-pope rally in Istanbul, Turkey, Friday, Nov. 24, 2006. Pope Benedict XVI will arrive in Turkey, his first visit to a Muslim country as pontiff, on Tuesday Nov. 28. Posters that read: 'No to the Crusaders alliance! The ignorant and sneaky pope should not come to Turkey' (AP Photo/Osman Orsal)

    A huge banner advertising an anti-pope rally is seen on the Istanbul headquarters of the Islamic Welfare Party in Istanbul, Turkey, Thursday, Nov. 23, 2006. Pope Benedict XVI will arrive in Turkey, his first visit to a Muslim country as pontiff, on Tuesday Nov. 28. The banner that reads: 'The ignorant and sneaky pope should not come to Turkey' (AP Photo/Murad Sezer)

    Via Amy, more from AsiaNews:

    It is no secret that the Turkish people have little liking for Benedict XVI. The Turks, sorry to say, do not like Pope Ratzinger. And this is not only because of his speech delivered in Regensburg in mid-September. Alongside the "religious problem", there is persistent antipathy – concealed less and less – towards the man who, as cardinal, had pronounced a “harsh” opinion about Turkey and its bid to join Europe.
    In this Muslim majority and nationalist country, the pope’s visit is annoying for both the people and the government, not least because it is clearly linked to an invitation from the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I and has a religious character.

    So in the papers, there is a constant trickle of news aimed at undermining and defaming these two figures of the Christian world (who are depicted as a coalition against Islam and Turkey), provoking controversies and irritation even on the most minor issues. So on one day, anger may be focused on the affront caused by the Greek Orthodox Patriarch who wanted to "set up a church" in the Hilton Hotel. This is just because there will be a press room in the hotel, as requested by Bartholomew I, with the possibility of watching on large screens the religious ceremonies due to take place in Istanbul on 30 November. The following day, anger could shift against the Pope, who "refused" the invitation to the traditional State dinner offered by the Turkish President Ahmet Necdet Sezer on 28 November. And attention is drawn to inconveniences that residents of Istanbul will have to put up with in those areas where the pope will go: access to their homes will be impeded and they will need a special police permit to park. Once again, it is quirks bordering on the ridiculous and gossip about the pope's vestments that are taking up space in newspapers, like the quest to understand why he has 33 buttons on his robe, why he wears red shoes and a gold ring.

    But not much space is devoted to protest rallies against the visit of Ratzinger.
    The more fanatical newspapers, like Vakit, last Sunday ran front-page appeals to cancel the invitation to a pope "who denigrated our prophet Muhammad and our Turkish nationality", and today they again highlighted the pope’s refusal to attend the ceremonial dinner, ridiculing Benedict XVI who "does not allow himself earthly pleasures." But the newspapers failed to emphasize a move by around 100 militants of the Great Union (an extreme right party, close to the Grey Wolves), who dared to pray in the Santa Sofia museum to protest against the Pope

    For people who call the pope "ignorant and sneaky", they themselves seem very ignorant and sneaky. Or at least those whom the AsiaNews article mentions are sneaky, and prey upon the ignorance of their readers.

    Your PPOTD, Friday Nov. 24th

    Once again, it was the written part of the "Is yours the true religion?" exam where Pope Benedict would really shine. And as always, he was a good sport about it.
    [photo: REUTERS/Alessandro Bianchi]

    Pope Calendar goes on sale

    Sadly, no surprises here

    Slapstick Politics takes a look at the U.K. Telegraph's boneheadedly-stupid claim that Pope Benedict is "question[ing] his infallibility" in his new book (via Relapsed Catholic).

    And as for the "wave of articles proclaiming the Church is revisiting its teaching on condoms" I predicted would start appearing, here's just a couple to confirm it:

    Wednesday, November 22, 2006

    Turkish riot police get some early practice ... inside the Hagia Sophia



    Turkish protesters chant Islamic slogans during an anti-Pope demonstration at the Hagia Sophia museum in Istanbul, Turkey, Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2006. Turkish police detained about 40 members of a nationalist party who occupied the Haghia Sophia, a 6th century Byzantine monument, to protest the visit next week of Pope Benedict XVI. The protesters belonged to the Great Unity Party, a far right-wing group that has previously staged demonstrations against the planned visit. The Haghia Sophia is on the pope's list of stops during his Nov. 28-Dec. 1 trip to Turkey. The Pope is making his first trip to a Muslim nation at a time of heightened tensions between the West and Islam. (AP Photo)

    I believe the single finger held in the air means something along the lines of "Allah is great, Allah is one." I'm sure one of my better-informed readers can tell me if I'm mistaken on that.

    A little more on the Pope Calendar

    Copies of the the Pope calendar are displayed in the Italian Catholic weekly Famiglia Cristiana (Catholic Family) news desk in Rome, Wednesday Nov. 22, 2006. The calendar, 'Together, a year with the Pope,' features 14 original poses of the 79-year-old pontiff with his white hair, taken during an entire day of shooting this summer at Castel Gandolfo, the pope's country residence near Rome and comes with the magazine for an extra charge of 5 euros ($6.40.) on Nov. 23.(AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)

    More on Lebanon

    From the Pope's general audience:
    At the end of today's general audience, Benedict XVI mentioned the attack yesterday in Lebanon in which Pierre Gemayel, the country's industry minister, was assassinated.

    "I firmly condemn this brutal attack," said Pope Benedict, "and give assurances of my prayers and my spiritual closeness to the family in mourning, and to the beloved Lebanese people. In the face of the dark forces that seek to destroy the country, I invite all Lebanese not to allow themselves to be overcome by hatred, but to reinforce national unity, justice and reconciliation, and to work together to build a future of peace. Finally, I invite leaders of the nations that have the fate of this region at heart to contribute to finding a global negotiated solution to the various situations of injustice that have existed for too many years."
    Via Amy, AsiaNews reports that Cardinal Sfeir is performing the funeral:
    The Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Nasrallah Sfeir will preside over the funeral at 1pm on Thursday, 22 November, in the Cathedral of St George in the heart of Beirut. He said he considers “the murder of Minister Gemayel as a new blow to much desired peace in the country after years of war” and he called attention to the necessity of keeping calm and not reacting violently, because Lebanon is no longer able to pay the price of violence. The patriarch finally appealed to the people’s conscience, that they may double efforts to stop this campaign of violence, expressing his solidarity with the family of Minister Gemayel. The religious ceremony for the murdered minister was desired by the Gemayel family as a “new act of obedience to God’s will.” After the funeral, the body will be taken to the minister’s village of origin in Bikfaya, near the tomb of his uncle Bashir, killed in 1982, his grandfather Pierre, founder of the Lebanese Phalange Party, and the daughter of President Bachir, young Maya, also killed 22 years ago by a car bomb.
    Related links:

    Tuesday, November 21, 2006

    Some Turkey headlines before Turkey Day

    Prayers needed for Lebanon

    Reuters:

    Lebanon braced on Wednesday for a bitter power struggle after the assassination of an anti-Syrian Christian cabinet minister which his allies blamed on Syria.

    Industry Minister Pierre Gemayel was gunned down on Tuesday as he drove in a Christian suburb of Beirut, becoming the sixth anti-Syria politician to be killed in nearly two years.

    Hours later, the U.N. Security Council approved plans for a special international court to try suspects in the February 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri.

    LifeSiteNews highlights, Nov. 22nd

    LifeSiteNews:

    See an advance screening of the Nativity Story - for free!

    That's right - in advance, for free:

    On Sunday, November 26th, an extraordinary event will take place at The Vatican. For the first time ever, a Hollywood premiere of a major motion picture will take place in Vatican City. The film, a compelling story of The Holy Family, comes to theaters everywhere on December 1st and is sure to become a timeless Christmas classic.

    On Monday, November 27th, a second extraordinary event will take place in 30 dioceses across the country and that is the US Premiere of this film, exclusively to Catholic leaders [and now anyone]. You are invited to attend and to forward this invitation to other Catholic leaders [and now anyone] you know in selected cities across this country (See invite below for cities). A full house in each of these theaters across the country will demonstrate to Hollywood that the Catholic market turns out with influence when presented with a product exemplifying the true, the good and the beautiful. This is one of those films. PLEASE make certain that any priest, diocesan leader, parish leader or Catholic apostolic leader you know attends one of these screenings.

    [Space is limited so it's first come, first serve]:

    http://www.maximusmg.com/NativityEvents/form.asp

    I've already got my "golden ticket" and plan on attending the Detroit advance screening.

    More on the Nativity Story at the official website, IMDB, and wikipedia. Trailers here.

    Cardinal Baum celebrates his 80th - another consistory due?

    Rocco has an post today on the American Cardinal Baum reaching his 80th birthday - and retiring from the list of papal electors eligible to elect a new pontiff.

    Might we expect another consistory of cardinals sometime around early summer? Rocco says:
    "Baum's superannuation leaves the number of voting cardinals at 115. Given Benedict XVI's keenness to keep the number at the Pauline limit of 120, and to keep the full complement regularly topped off, look for a consistory sometime in the late spring or early summer, by which time the number of cardinal-electors will fall to 107, just on account of more princes of the church hitting the big 8-0."
    Update: CWNews adds more.

    "Do a little wrong?" (on taking it upon yourself to fix faulty translations)

    Ed Peters writes about a priest who decided to change the translation of pro multis long before the Vatican had issued its decision:

    Obviously thoughtful and desirous of bringing sound liturgy to his people, [a priest] wrote that, with a smattering of Latin and some input from those who knew more, he had long ago substituted "for the many" in place of "for all" when he celebrated Mass. He justifies his action on the grounds that "for all" was clearly wrong and that people deserve a correct translation of the Mass. He added that, if his bishop were to direct him to stop the practice, he would do so immediately.

    I think this approach is quite wrong. [Find out why...]

    Pope Benedict finishes his book

    CNS:
    Pope Benedict XVI has completed the first volume of a major scholarly and spiritual book on Jesus of Nazareth, a work he began several years before being elected pope.

    "Jesus of Nazareth: From the Baptism in the Jordan to the Transfiguration" is scheduled for a March release in Italian by the Rizzoli publishing house and in German by Herder Verlag.

    Announcing the publication Nov. 21, Rizzoli and the Vatican gave reporters copies of the book's preface and a portion of its introduction.

    In the preface, signed "Joseph Ratzinger -- Benedict XVI," the pope wrote that for decades he had noticed a growing scholarly distinction between the "historical Jesus" and the "Christ of faith," a distinction that many Christians now accept as accurate.

    But, he wrote, if the human Jesus was totally different from the Jesus depicted in the Gospels and proclaimed by the church, what does it mean to have faith in him?

    "I trust the Gospels," the pope wrote. [More...]
    Reuters spends a fair amount of its time looking for rumors of the Pope's failing health:

    Pope Benedict has finished the first volume of a book on the life of Jesus Christ and has decided to publish what he has written so far because he doesn't know "how much time and strength" he has left.

    ... He says he started writing the book during his summer holidays in 2003 when he was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and has been dedicating "every spare minute" to the project since his election.

    "Because I don't know how much time and how much strength will still be granted to me, I have decided to publish the first 10 chapters as the first volume," he writes in the preface.

    The Pope appears to be in generally good health, but since his election he has made several public references to being old and not knowing how much more time God will give him.

    The Associated Press spends most its time also pointing out that the book is noninfallible and again quotes Pope Benedict saying that everyone is free to contradict him. Great, these are the important angles to the story...

    Moving on. I'm particularly thrilled about this announcement since I'm taking a course right now on "The Gospel of Mark and the Historical Jesus," so hopefully I'll have a bit more context and background to understand what the Pope is talking about when I'm able to read it.

    And of course, if anyone wants to send me an advance copy before March for review purposes ...

    Update:
    VATICAN CITY, NOV 21, 2006 (VIS) - The Holy See Press Office today released a communique stating: "The Holy Father Benedict XVI has completed writing the first part of a book, the title of which is 'Gesu di Nazareth. Dal Battesimonel Giordano alla Trasfigurazione' (Jesus of Nazareth, From His Baptism in the Jordan to the Transfiguration) and, within the last few days, has consigned it to the Vatican Publishing House. The book will be published in spring 2007."
    CNA: Pope Benedict XVI completes first book of Pontificate, "Jesus of Nazareth"

    The condom debate is back - and this time, it's official

    Cardinal Barragan has been busy:
    The Vatican is proceeding with an in-depth study on the use of condoms to prevent the spread of infectious diseases.

    At a November 21 press conference in Rome, Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan revealed that the Pontifical Council on Health Care, which he heads, has finished a detailed report on the scientific aspects of the issue. That report is now being studied by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he said. [source]
    The Associated Press adds more:

    We have prepared a detailed study on condoms from both the scientific and moral points of view and we have passed our study on to the Congregation for the Faith," Barragan said. "Now the dossier is being studied by that office and then it will go before the pope."

    Barragan said that Pope Benedict XVI is "greatly concerned" by the issue and that the dossier was prepared at his request.

    And of course, Cardinal Martini's intervention concludes the AP's report (Martini, of course, is still being referred to as a papal contender to increase his visibility):
    But several leading churchmen have spoken out on the issue in recent years as the Vatican has come under increasing criticism for its position. Some - such as a one-time papal contender, retired Milan Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini - say that condoms were the "lesser evil" in combatting the spread of AIDS. Other cardinals, however, have rejected their argument - an indication that the issue is still undecided at the Vatican.
    Reuters has a more complete treatment, albiet an oddly phrased headline ("Pope-commissioned condom study passes first hurdle" ... "hurdle"? Is that supposed to imply it was being opposed?):

    A study commissioned by Pope Benedict on the use of condoms to fight AIDS has passed its first hurdle and is now being reviewed by top theologians for possible use in a Papal document, a cardinal said on Tuesday.

    "This is something that worries the Pope a lot," said Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan, head of the Vatican's Pontifical Council for Health Pastoral Care.

    ... His department had completed a 200-page study ...

    ... The study, which would not be made public, would then be passed on to the Pope, who may use it for his own pronouncement.

    "First, we must consider if there is a need for an answer (on the use of condoms) at the supreme level," he said.

    ... "We hope the theologians and the Holy Father will say what is best regarding this subject ... but no response from the Church can be one that encourages a libertine sexual attitude," he said.

    ... the Vatican has been loath to issue any document that could be interpreted as a green light for the use of condoms to stop the spread of AIDS, fearing it would endorse promiscuity.

    Brace yourselves for a new wave of article proclaiming the Church is revisiting its teaching on condoms (or contraception in general)... or maybe they've learned their lesson? Either way, I'll be watching.

    AmP covered Martini's comments on allowing condoms to HIV-infected couples earlier this year. There is a permanent page here with several expert articles from the National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly and Christian Order explaining the issues involved. There is also a complete list of all AmP posts on this debate.

    Update: The press release from the Vatican Information Service is available here.

    LifeSiteNews highlights, Nov. 21st

    LifeSiteNews:

    Monday, November 20, 2006

    Some interesting words from Bartholomew...

    This is all fine and good...

    The spiritual leader of the world's Orthodox Christians cautioned Turks, in an interview published in Sunday’s Sabah newspaper, against creating potential "unpleasant incidents" during Pope Benedict XVI's trip to Turkey next week.

    Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I said the Pope's trip, scheduled for Nov. 28-Dec. 1, was a great opportunity for the country, and one that should not be disrupted by violent protest.

    He warned that if protests turn violent, they could cause problems for Turkey in its efforts to join the European Union. "The Pope has a say in all Catholic countries," Bartholomew reportedly told Sabah. "If there are psychologically [psychologically?!] unpleasant incidents, then this would be an issue in Brussels in December [I assume an important upcoming meeting on EU entry]. Even if not at the official level, they would talk about it between themselves."

    But this?
    Bartholomew, however, said he would tell the pontiff that "it is not wrong for Turkey to become a member of the EU as a Muslim country because it would bring mutual richness."

    "The EU should not remain as a Christian club," the newspaper quoted Bartholomew as saying. [source]
    But hasn't the Vatican been trying to underscore just this precise unifying element of the EU - its Christian foundation and common Christian history? I'm sure we haven't heard the last of this debate.

    "Benedict XVI may have youth event during May Brazil trip" - CNA

    CNA:

    Church officials in Brazil have informed CNA that Pope Benedict XVI is determining the final details of his travel to the South American country to attend next year’s 5th General Conference of the Latin American Bishops’ Council, and they said the visit may include a massive gathering with young people in the city of Sao Paulo.

    Although the Holy See has not yet confirmed the reports, according to local sources the Pontiff may begin his visit to Brazil with a massive gathering on May 10 with young people at the Campo de Marte airport in northern Sao Paulo.

    On May 11 the Pope may meet with the members of the National Conference of Bishops of Brazil.

    The Pope would then travel to the Marian Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida, some 170 kilometers north of Sao Paulo, where he will open the 5th General Conference of the Latin American Bishops’ Council, which will bring together cardinals, archbishops, and bishops from across the Americas.

    Anyone got a pair of tickets to Brazil burning a hole in their pocket? :)

    Drive Safe, Urges Pope

    Before your commute home today, read up:

    Pope Benedict XVI remembered the victims of motor-vehicle accidents during his Sunday Angelus audience on November 19, and urged all drivers to be alert and to obey the rules of the road.

    "I tirelessly ask motorists to respect the traffic regulations, and always to pay attention to others," the Pope said, noting that the day is an annual public commemoration of traffic-accident victims. [source]

    This might not seem like the most pressing message at first.

    That is, unless you've ever tried crossing a street in Italy....

    An apology from the pastor responsible for that halloween costume Mass

    ... is available at Amy's.

    As she said: "it's a start."

    After all, a decade or so ago the few people who might have privately complained to the pastor would probably have been laughed off, and that could well have been the end of it.

    Now, with a video camera, YouTube, and St. Blogs - we've received a public apology (of sorts) from the pastor.

    To all the people who were on the ground and active on the web during this one - good job, mates. Put that kind of stupidity in the spotlight and it can't last for long.

    Times - I hope they keep a'changing...

    Chris Blosser adds more to the border fence debate

    Thoughts about St. Blog's Debate over the "Border Fence."

    Also, this is probably an appropriate place to point out this article by Sandro Magister, which outlines Martino's longstanding "anti-Ratzingerian manifesto."

    Your PPOTD! - Monday, Nov. 20

    President Napolitano, tragically misinformed regarding the purpose of his visit, waited in vain to be constituted by the Pope as the honarary head of the Swiss Guard.

    [photo: AP Photo/Plinio Lepri, Pool]

    Is your parish praying for the Pope's safety?

    This morning at Mass the congregation was asked to pray in a special way for the Pope's safety during his upcoming trip to Turkey. And over the last week or so I've noticed that many Masses I've attended include a special prayer for the Pope's safety during the intercessions.

    So, I'm wondering how many parishes around the U.S. are doing the same. Iif you have a moment, please drop a line in the comment box below if your parish is praying for the Pope's safety. Thanks!

    Update: I've been recommending this "Spiritual Pilgrimage with Pope Benedict XVI", which begins on Nov. 26 (the Solemnity of Christ the King) for those who want to pray for the Pope's safety in a special way.

    Update 2: I've moved this post to the top of the page so weekday readers can also have a chance of chiming in with their recent experiences at Mass. Keep the comments coming!

    Sunday, November 19, 2006

    The Pro Multis post For The Few who don't know about it yet

    For the sake of completeness, here's my play-by-play coverage of the Pro Multis decision and its ensuing coverage across St. Blogs:

    At 5:50PM last Friday, Rocco starts us off with a simple one-line post: "Pro multis" = "For many" = "Done Deal."

    At 9:00 the next morning (Saturday), Fr. John shows his hand (yes, this was the news he was excited over but couldn't tell anyone about):

    "Since another blog has decided (perhaps imprudently) to publish something on it, and since it is already commented on by participants in this blog (for good or ill), here goes.

    Three different well-placed sources I trust in Congregations here in Rome confirmed for me that the Holy Father made the determination that the words pro multis in the consecration of the Precious Blood will be properly translated, "for many", in the upcoming English text now in preparation. I had reason to be optimistic about this quite some time ago, but these confirmations go far beyond previous news." [More...]

    CWNews soon makes the news official, and reveals that Cardinal Arinze (of course) is the harbinger of the change:

    The Vatican has ruled that the phrase pro multis should be rendered as "for many" in all new translations of the Eucharistic Prayer, CWN has learned.

    ... Cardinal Francis Arinze, the prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship, has written to the heads of world's episcopal conferences, informing them of the Vatican decision. For the countries where a change in translation will be required, the cardinal's letter directs the bishops to prepare for the introduction of a new translation of the phrase in approved liturgical texts "in the next one or two years." [More...]

    Fr. John remains emphatic, however, that the decision was made at the request of Pope Benedict [More...].

    Gerard jumps on the news as soon as he sees it, and offers a quick explanation for why he is pleased.

    By Sunday, Dom pulls some strings and magically produces the entire text of Arinze's letter.

    That same afternoon, Jeff finds a cool graphic that I've used at the top of this post (here's where he got it).
    Amy reads everything and makes her decision for who gets the spotlight (Fr. John, naturally enough).
    Finally, American Papist reads about the story all weekend but doesn't get organized enough to cover it until desperately late into Sunday evening.
    ... and that's how the news cookie crumbles here at St. Blogs! :-)

    Save the Wren Cross (petition)

    From reader Will:
    I'm a ... student at the College of William & Mary in Virginia. If you're not familiar with it, it's the second oldest college in the country. The Wren Building on campus, the oldest academic building in the US still in use, has a chapel attached to it. The College was originally part of the Anglican Church. Recently our new College President ordered the cross removed from the altar table and locked away unless specifically requested to be out on the altar, in order to make the chapel less "faith specific" and because the cross made some students feel unwelcome - despite an existing policy whereby the cross could be removed upon request. Figured you might be interested in the story, our website where people are signing the petition (we have 3200+ so far) to have the cross restored is: www.savethewrencross.org.

    In the mailbox...

    Two books by John L. Allen have been sent to me for review purposes:
    Looks like it'll be a busy Christmas break for reviewing books. John L. Allen, as many of you may know, works for the National Catholic Reporter and runs a Catholic news blog here. Other books I'm currently (or planning on) reviewing are listed on the sidebar.

    Spend a day with Abp. Burke in remembrance of Fr. Hardon - for free!

    Details from Diane at her blog Te Deum laudamus. It looks to be a great event and I'd like to attend.

    From the inbox...

    Some misc. link requests:
    • Matt C. Abbott: "Jesuit Defends Priestly Celibacy"
    • Paul Catalanotto's review of Dawn Eden's new book.
    • Orthfully Catholic: the blog of a group of seminarians in England. [These guys need our prayers! - AmP]
    • Virginia Catholic Alliance, organizing Virginia's Catholic bloggers: "Starting out with a common blog roll, our intent is to be able to increase individual readership for a better spread and exchange of ideas. As readership continues increases, we hope to leverage that to support other Catholic missions, such as charities and the Virginia Catholic Conference." [local organization is a very good thing and I'd love to see something like that develop for Michigan Catholic bloggers as well...]
    • Andrew sent this in, a youtube video entitled "the most holy sacrifice of the Mass".
    • An updated on World Youth Day merchandise from Tim: " word from the Aussies is that all wyd products will be available for shipping in December except for the hats. Hats won't be ready until January. They didn't nail down a date, and said with international shipping they didn't want to promise items would arrive in time for Christmas." [wkyp]

    The search rankings for "papist"

    A little checkup on who is representing "papist" on the WWW:

    Only one more spot to go...

    Yahoo! is coming along nicely as well:

    Remember, Yahoo! used to have this horrible suggestion. But luckily they've seen the light. =)

    Photos: Anti-Pope protests in Turkey

    Another protest in Turkey:


    "Kemal Kerincsiz, a nationalist lawyer and member of the Great Lawyers Union, carries a placard to protest against the upcoming visit by Pope Benedict XVI to Turkey, during a demonstration in Istanbul November 19, 2006. The placard reads 'Patriarch and Pope are in Fener (patriarchate). Where are the Turkish nation? We don't want the Pope in Turkey '. REUTERS/Stringer (TURKEY) "

    ... someone want to offer a translation of that translation?

    Saturday, November 18, 2006

    LifeSiteNews highlights, Nov. 18

    LifeSiteNews:

    Friday, November 17, 2006

    Get ... a ... life.

    A man collided with a flagpole (video/story here) in a mad dash to get a place in line to buy the new playstation 3 game console. What's hilarious is how the whole story is treated as if its real news.

    The real news, of course, is how stupid this craziness is. Grow up, people - it's a game.

    Video & Promotion: Leigh Nash, Christian Female Vocalist

    Someone promoting Leigh Nash, the "former frontwoman" singer of Sixpence None the Richer ("Kiss Me", etc), recently took out an AmP BlogAd. Since I always screen my advertisters before accepting them, I visited her site, did a little research, and listened to her first single, My Idea of Heaven (embedded below).

    I enjoyed the song very much, and exactly like this reviwer, a week later inextricably had the intense wish to hear it played again (which I am doing, right now). She has a delightful sound and theme to her music, and as I've learned more about her life and career I've also come to appreciate having her work promoted on AmP, so I decided to give her music a little extra plug.


    Wikipedia has a good entry on her. On her myspace profile she "admits her newfound maternity" has been "a source of inspiration" for her music. This blog keeps up to date on news related to her and has a post with her upcoming tour dates. (NY, CT, VA & NC up next). Looks like she is touring with BNL.

    Here is a video interview with her where she talks about being a mom and singing about her son. In a seperate interview at ChristianMusicPlanet, we find out where her old band, Sixpence, got their name:
    Slocum [leader of Sixpence] derived the band name from an illustration in the book, "Mere Christianity," by C.S. Lewis. According to Slocum, the story is about a child who goes to his father and asks for a sixpence to buy his dad a present. So, the father really buys his own gift. Says Slocum in an interview with TV Guide Online, "The point is our abilities are given to us by God. All of our doing and creations are, in essence, giving back."

    You can buy her latest CD ("Blue on Blue") here at Amazon, and here is the link to her official website. For those of you with iTunes, here is where you can digitally buy her Christmas album.

    Now that's my idea of a singer.

    LifeSiteNews headlines, Nov. 17th

    LifeSiteNews:

    Thursday, November 16, 2006

    AFP picture/caption/story of the day ... connecting the dots

    First, the picture (see above).

    Second, the caption: "Priests carry baskets during the first open-air mass led by Pope Benedict XVI, the first mass of his visit to Munich, in his native Bavaria region of Germany, in September 2006. The US Roman Catholic Church has asked a criminology school to delve into the darkest pages of its history by probing the causes of a priest sex abuse scandal.(AFP/File/Johannes Eisele)."

    Third, the story: "At a meeting due to end Thursday in the eastern city of Baltimore, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops voted to disburse 335,000 dollars to fund the first three phases of a study by New York's John Jay College of Criminal Justice."

    Connecting the dots, the conclusion that the AFP wants its reader to make: The next time a priest walks towards you with a collection basket at Mass, be warned that your money is probably going right to the John Jay College of Criminal Justice to finance its ongoing efforts to "delve into the darkest pages of [the Catholic Church's] history."

    ... or am I getting paranoid again?

    In fact, I find it more than convenient that a picture of priests carrying baskets is connected with a story of money appropriation to John Jay for sexual abuse studies. Especially since the media constantly likes noting that poor disenfranchised Catholics can only have a vote in the Church when they wield their checkbook.

    A couple short Turkey trip updates...

    Then I absolutely, positively must finish some reading assignments for class this evening:

    Turkey announces extra security plans for papal visit:

    Turkish authorities will deploy 4,000 police officers to handle security during the visit by Pope Benedict XVI, the AKI news service reports.

    The government's plans for security during the papal visit-- which will be from November 28 to December 1-- include sharpshooters posted on rooftops and surveillance cameras in urban areas. The government will be monitoring the activities of militant groups as well and assigning extra police details to watch the crowds at papal appearances.

    Turkish officials, who have been unenthusiastic about the Pope's arrival, have made a point of announcing that they will allow public protests against the Pontiff. However, those demonstrations will be kept within designated areas, they say, to minimize the possibility of confrontation.

    Pope trip will not heal wounds, says Turkey’s religious head:

    Turkey’s head of religious affairs says the Pope’s visit to Turkey later this month may help improve relations with Muslims, but he does not believe it will heal the wounds stemming from the Pontiff’s misinterpreted remarks about Islam in September.

    Rare Fra Angelico paintings found in spare room!

    As a great lover of Fra Angelico's work, this news pleased me:

    Jean Preston liked the paintings when she came across them in California in the 1960s and got her art collector dad to buy them for a few hundred pounds - so she could "indulge her interest in curious works", The Independent reports.

    Little did she know, the works by the Italian Renaissance master had been missing for 200 years.

    Painted in the 1430s, they were part of a magnificent altarpiece in Florence and believed to have been lost or destroyed during the Napoleonic wars, nearly 400 years after their creation.

    One of her relatives told The Independent:

    "Jean bought the paintings because she thought they were rather nice. Someone came in with a box of things they wanted to get rid of. None wanted them but she was a medievalist and actually thought that they were quite nice. When I used to stay with her I slept on a sofa bed underneath the paintings. Who would have thought she had the equivalent of a winning lottery ticket in her spare room all these years?"
    But really, so much more than a lotto ticket!

    Anyway, CNA reports that they are going up for auction in England and are expected to sell for over £1 million.

    The Milingo Meeting - Details

    From this morning's VIS:

    "As announced earlier, this morning in the Vatican, the Holy Father met with heads of dicasteries of the Roman Curia in order to examine the situation that has arisen following the disobedience of Archbishop Emmanuel Milingo. The order of the day also included an examination of requests for dispensation from the obligation of celibacy, and requests for readmission to the priestly ministry presented by married priests over the course of recent years."

    I'm trying to get some useful nuggets out of the AFP's coverage:

    The former archbishop of the Zambian capital Lusaka [[Milingo] wrote an open letter to the pope early this month asking that married priests and bishops be gradually "reinstated into the fabric of our Church."

    "A new Catholic Church is forming with or without your blessing," he warned.

    Now that's a quote I haven't heard before. The article goes on to say that a statement about the meeting will be released later today (though they could simply be referring to the VIS which I posted above).

    Reuters has Milingo claiming that "over 150,000 married priests stand waiting and willing to serve [the Church]," which seems like an outrageously-overblown figure to me.

    I like Bloomberg's headline: "Pope Holds Emergency Meeting Today to Discuss Priest Celibacy". That's like saying "Pope Holds Emergency Meeting Today to Discuss Next Saturday's Lunch Menu."

    The AP's coverage is probably the most balanced and informed, and makes it clear that the Vatican has continually insisted that removal of priestly celibacy is not anywhere near the table.

    Rather, the actual questions being discussed are "requests for dispensation made by priests wishing to marry and requests for readmission by clergy who had married in recent years."

    In effect this meeting is addressing the situation of two groups: men who were laicized and now are requesting a second, seperate permission to be dispensed from their vow of celibacy (in order to marry). I'd imagine this category is very small since most priests who left the priesthood don't normally bother to ask the Vatican's permission to marry.

    The other larger group of men consists of those who, having left the priesthood or having undergone laicization (and even gotten married, without or without being dispensed from their vow of celibacy), now may wish to be readmitted and serve as priests again. This is the more interesting and significant question, and probably the one that merits a curia meeting.

    Update: Pope & Curia discuss Milingo, priestly celibacy - CWNews

    Update 2: "Pope 'Re-Affirms' Celibacy, Ends Possibility of Married Priests" (... AGAIN). One wonders how many times a Pontiff will have to "end the possibility" before the press admits it has actually ended. I'm sure we'll see the question brought up again in a few months, like clockwork.

    Anyway, here's the only quotation taken from the statement the Vatican sent out:

    The participants of the [curia] meeting "re-affirmed the value of a priest choosing to be celibate in accordance to the Catholic tradition,'' the Holy See said in a statement sent by e-mail.
    While News.com.au puts it this way:


    "The importance of the choice of priestly celibacy according to the Catholic tradition was reaffirmed," the Vatican said in a statement
    Now, I've heard Dom complain about this before - and I have to completely agree with him - why aren't these e-mail statements made available to Catholic press agencies at the same time as the secular ones? (Are they?) In other words, why does the secular news media always get to beat Catholic news agencies to the punch on Catholic topics involving Vatican press releases?

    Am I missing out on some e-mail listserve that everyone else knows about?

    Update 3: Vatican reaffirms the value of priestly celibacy

    [photo: AP Photo/ L'Osservatore Romano]

    Profile: A Pope deep in thought

    What troubles ye, dear Pope?
    [photo: AFP/Vincenzo Pinto]

    LifeSiteNews highlights, Nov. 16th

    LifeSiteNews:

    Wednesday, November 15, 2006

    Sticky: AmP coverage of the U.S. bishops' fall meeting in Baltimore

    • AmP's complete coverage of Day One (Monday) here. Pictures of protesters here.
    • complete coverage of Day Two (Tuesday) here. More pictures of protesters here.
    • Update: complete coverage of Day Three (Wednesday) here. PPTOD here.
    • Of interest: What did the Church of England say about euthanasia and newborns? Find out.

    More on the Pope Calendar

    Remember that Pope Calendar?

    The ever-resourceful Teresa Benedetta of the PapaRatzingerForum finds out more for us:

    Readers of the magazine can get it at their newsstands with the issue of November 23. By buying the calendar, they will be able to see the Pope in informal previously unpublished pictures and to support a project for children in Rwanda.

    Such calendars as fund-raisers for specific charities are a tradition at Famiglia Cristiana, but the idea of a specially-photographed Papal calendar is unique and special. Each picture of the month will be accompanied by a passage from the Holy Father's first encyclical, Deus caritas est, as well as facts about the beneficiary project in Rwanda.

    To reserve copies of the calendar, write to:

    San Paolo

    Periodici San Paolo

    piazza San Paolo

    12 12051 ALBA (CN)

    She also found pictures!


    I'll be on the look-out for more details on ordering the Pope Calendar. What a Pope!

    Should polls @ GMA be allowed to be so biased?

    Reader Ann notified me of a poll on priestly celibacy residing in the article "Should Catholic Priests Be Allowed to Marry?" over at ABC News, and I think Good Morning America has picked it up.

    The kicker? This is how the poll is worded:

    Pope Benedict XVI has called for a meeting this week in the Vatican to consider whether the vows of celibacy and the ban on marriage for priests who are married or want to be married should be overturned.

    Should Catholic priests be allowed to marry?

    Yes. It is unfair to prevent them from experiencing one of life's joys: companionship.

    No. The vows are founded in religious doctrine and tradition and should not be changed.

    I'm not sure.

    "It is unfair to prevent them from experiencing one of life's joys: companionship." Grr, bad church, bad! Depriving those poor men of companionship - one of life's joys, don't ya know?! With polls like these, who needs results? The choice is clear!

    A little quote from later in the article:

    "As foreign as the concept may seem today, the first pope, St. Peter, was married. "

    More foolery:

    "A married Italian priest will hold a prayer vigil in St. Peter's Square tonight, hoping to influence Pope Benedict, who will hold what amounts to a cabinet-level meeting to reflect on the crisis Thursday. "

    "... But Pope Benedict, a stalwart conservative, is unlikely to relax a rule that has been in place nearly 1,000 years."

    On the one-hand, the reporter is savvy enough about the ecclesiological structure of the Catholic Church to confidently claim that a curia meeting is equivalent to a "cabinet-level meeting", but on the other hand, the voice voiceover reporter says on the video:
    "[married priests] say that marriage is a sacrament, and that is a a higher calling than celibacy."
    I'm not sure where that quote originated, but wherever it came from - *wow*. Who exactly didn't know that holy orders is a sacrament? I doubt it was the married priests. So, did they withold that detail from the reporter? Did the reporter fabricate it? Either way, the reporter doesn't have the first hint about what she is discussing. For instance: "for priests in the Catholic Church, abstinence is next to Godliness..." Spare me.

    The video also includes the obligatory quote from a married priest claiming that a married priesthood would have prevented the clergy-abuse scandal.

    Be prepared for many more MSM articles this week claiming that the Church is looking to revise its traditional teaching on celibate priests. Don't they recognize a sailed boat when they've seen one?

    Chris Burgwald's mp3 interview with Michael Waldstein on Theology of the Body

    Via Chris Burgwald:

    "As some of you know, in my capacity as Director of Adult Faith Formation for the Diocese of Sioux Falls I recently started a podcast, titled -- thanks, Jeff! -- Prairie Rome Companion (the feed is available here).

    I've got a few episodes up, as well as a number of our Theology on Tap presentations, but I'm really excited about the 4th and most recent episode of the podcast [click here to download in mp3 format], in which I interview Dr. Michael Waldstein, who did the new, more precise and accurate translation of the Theology of the Body (Pauline Books published it last month [available on Amazon here])."

    I can't wait to hear it myself!

    Follow-up: Cardinals respond to the british euthanasia for disabled newborns debate

    Some people in the combox of the blog post "Does the Church of England support Infant Euthanasia or not?" asked why the Catholic heirarchy has been silent on the debate. Today, Cardinals Barragan and Lozano stood up:

    Speaking with Italian reporters, Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan, president of the Pontifical Council for Health Care, deplored the "cruelty" of a proposal to allow newborns with severe handicapped to be euthanized in the United Kingdom.

    The cardinal noted that the position of the Church "is unchanged, life does not belong to man but to the Lord. The life of an innocent being cannot be taken either by direct or indirect means. Euthanasia is never permissible. This goes for the terminally ill and for children, including those born with serious problems."

    According to Cardinal Lozano, "Ending the life of an innocent person, even if it is a premature baby who is gravely ill, is the equivalent of euthanasia, and this is an illicit action, as well as an act of cruelty."

    He also stressed that the "Catholic Church does not impose, she proposes her doctrine," as the "dignity of the human person is based on the primordial principle that is human life and that we defend from beginning to end."

    Cardinal Lozano also emphasized that the Church does not teach that doctors must use disproportionate means or medicines that will only prolong the agony of a person who would otherwise be close to death. "Nobody should be obliged to accept this kind of therapy," he said. "But in the case that is being presented here, we are dealing with murder. We must remember that the fifth commandment says, Thou shalt not kill."

    In Great Britain, Anglican Bishop Tom Butler of Southwark said his church would not support the euthanasia for newborns and he called for distinctions to be made between euthanasia and the rejection of extraordinary means. [CNA]

    A very nice clear and concise exposition of Catholic teaching. And the last paragraph seems to agree with my evaluation of Butler's position. Please God his words are heeded by the doctors ...

    Time magazine takes a respectful look at habit-wearing, blogging nuns

    Via Gerard (who is on the road) and Amy (who mostly approves):

    Today's Nun Has A Veil--And A Blog -- Time Magazine
    "More young women are entering convents. How they are changing the sisterhood"

    [Local all-stars - the Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist (here in Ann Arbor) - get a well-deserved mention:]

    "Sister Joseph Andrew Bogdanowicz, vocation director ... credits e-mail to some extent with what can only be described as her order's astonishing growth. Founded in 1997 as an offshoot of a large convent, the Sisters now have 73 members with an average age of 24. In 2006, 15 women entered as postulants. Next August, more than 20 women are scheduled to join them. The order is fund raising for a new convent for them to live in. "We cannot build fast enough. It's incredible," says Bogdanowicz, 50."

    The Mary, Mother of the Eucharist website appears to be down/extremely slow. Hopefully they are getting deluged with visitors because of this article.

    [photo credit: SAHANNON TAGGART FOR TIME]

    Women's rights take another tentative step in Islamic Pakistan

    Via SotHW:

    "Islam makes a belabored step towards equal-rights"

    BBC - Pakistan is amending its laws to allow prosecution for rape

    The head mufti of Australia recently made the news for comparing women without burkas to "exposed meat."

    Bishops in Baltimore - Day 3: AmP Coverage

    The American bishops are meeting in Baltimore this week, and most of the attention is going to be focused on three documents they are discussing: one on natural family planning, another on the reception of communion, and the third on ministry to homosexuals. Day 3 is being conducted off-camera and in closed sessions.

    Day 3 coverage:

    Here are links to the three documents released by the conference yesterday (PDF format!): Married Love and the Gift of Life // Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination: Guidelines for Pastoral Care // Happy Are Those Who Are Called to His Supper: On Preparing to Receive Christ Worthily in the Eucharist

    News coverage:

    Hum0rous: Bettnet posts a "USCCB Document Generator" ("thoughtful collaborative stewardship"? sounds good to me!)

    [photo credit: AP Photo/Chris Gardner]

    Your PPOTD, Wednesday Nov. 15

    "Mons. Gaenswein had been trained well, but today there was no way to hide the fact that he was borrowing someone else's cassock."

    (SotHW also picked-out this picture of Il Papa that can only be described as "Awesome." They are asking for captions...)

    [photo: AP Photo/Plinio Lepri]

    Tuesday, November 14, 2006

    New Simpsons Movie Trailer

    To lighten the mood...



    I haven't watched a new episode of the simpsons in a couple years. I've heard it's gone downhill since when I last watched it regularly. Hopefully the movie rallies.

    Oh hush up, Cardinal Martino!

    Your talking isn't helping your public image (or the Church's):

    "A senior Vatican cardinal on Tuesday condemned the building of walls between countries to keep out immigrants and said Washington's plan to build a fence on the U.S.-Mexican border was part of an "inhuman program".

    Cardinal Renato Martino made his comments at a news conference presenting Pope Benedict's message for the Roman Catholic Church's World Day of Migrants and Refugees, in which the Pope called for more laws to help immigrants integrate."

    ...

    Asked if the U.S.-Mexican fence was the wrong thing to do, Martino said: "Yes, that's exactly what it is." [More...]

    Gee, I wonder what famous country has a big wall around it. Around almost the entire perimeter, in fact. Jeff, how about you help the Cardinal remember (hint: you've been there before, Cardinal, and visit it often).

    Update: One of the causes for my taking exception to the Cardinal's words:

    CCC # 2241

    The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. Public authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that places a guest under the protection of those who receive him.

    Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible, may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions, especially with regard to the immigrants' duties toward their country of adoption. Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying civic burdens.

    I've also read Pope Benedict's "Message for World Day of Migrants and Refugees" and find no references to walls protecting boarders being immoral. The document speaks about the integration of individuals in countries they are already residing in and discourages families splitting up (presumably because one of them has obtained a legal work visa and not others). More lively debate on Jeff's combox wall.

    As for Martino, he's been doing this sort of stuff for a long while. Here are a couple selections from a piece by Michael Novak on Martino's famous reputation on these types of issues:

    When I was in Rome last February, Cardinal Martino was already under heavy fire for his intemperate and irrepressible anti-Americanism. Even those who before the war leaned more to the French/German position than to the American were dismayed by his uncalled-for comments.

    Il Foglio pointed out today that Cardinal Sodano, the secretary of state (the official who functions something like a prime minister for the Vatican, the top leader of administration domestic and foreign), not only changed the whole title of the document on World Peace released today but also edited out the most offensive passages of Cardinal Martino, from whose department the draft arrived in the last few days.

    The title, for example, went from "International Law, a Way of Peace," to the less ideological "An Ever Timely Commitment: Teaching Peace." Other rhetorical flourishes were also edited out, according to Il Foglio.

    ...

    As for Cardinal Martino, he has made clear on many occasions how bitterly he feels toward the United States on many fronts, not only in the case of Iraq. He has not been altogether prudent. He does not seem to be aware of how oddly his behavior comports with the far more nuanced and modulated views of those around him with greater authority than his. [source]

    More on Martino from Amy Welborn:

    When I heard on the radio yesterday, "A Vatican Cardinal has criticized the US for the way it has treated Saddam Hussein," I immediately said, "Martino." Yup. What an idiot. Once again, we revisit the Mysteries of Vatican Diplomese, which are, to tell the truth, more abstruse than the Mystery of the Holy Trinity... I see no sense in trying to unpack why Martino said what he said and what he should have said. He said it, and it's done a lot of damage - one wishes someone would send Martino a tape of ten minutes of the local drive-time radio call-in show we heard yesterday as we left Chicago.
    I'd recommend everything Amy has to say about Martino.

    More on Martino from Mark Shea:

    "...as some of the behind-the-scenes dynamic of this act of stupidity are fleshed out, I find they are reflecting something of the same arguments going on in the Vatican that Novak mentions. In plain English, so far from reflecting the General Will of the Vatican, Martino was stubbornly bound and determined to say his foolish remarks against the counsel of his advisors and not a few people in Rome are unhappy that, instead of keeping the focus on the message he was supposed to give, he diverted the focus to himself."
    Prof. Brainbridge talks about Martino here.

    Jimmy Akin takes Martino to task for his public statements about Saddam and the death penalty: "In any event, these are statements unworthy of responsible churchmen. If one wants to oppose the death penalty on various grounds, fine, but these aren't worthy ones, and these kinds of deliverances do not further rational dialogue on the matter."

    I guess my point with all these quotes is that I'm not the first nor the only person in the world to point out Martino's foibles. If I was uncharitable in the way I expressed my frustration with his actions, I apologize for that. I make no apologies for disagreeing with Martino's continued unreasonable criticism of so many American projects (be it the Iraq war, the treatment of Saddam, the impending execution of Saddam, or the wall ... and there will be others I'm sure).

    I also continue to warn against equating every last word of Martino's with the words and authority of Pope Benedict and the Chair of Peter. Basic Catholic ecclesiology shows that following Cardinals on prudential decisions as if they are Popes speaking ex cathedra is misplaced zeal and those who insist upon doing so can leave themselves as well as the Church at large open to embarassment when their positions are evaluated more fully.

    Bishops in Baltimore - Day 2: AmP Coverage

    The American bishops are meeting in Baltimore this week, and most of the attention is going to be focused on three documents they are discussing: one on natural family planning, another on the reception of communion, and the third on ministry to homosexuals.

    Amy lets us know that the public sessions are being aired on EWTN here (schedule here). Tuesday afternoon, 2-5pm EST is the next broadcast.

    Day 2 coverage:

    [photo credit: AP Photo/Chris Gardner]

    Day 2: Protesters at the USCCB meeting in Baltimore

    "Anti-war demonstrators hold signs hoping to get the attention of the clergy attending the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2006 in Baltimore. (AP Photo/Chris Gardner)"
    *sniff* "I ruined my cute little white pillow cover to bring you this important message of peace." *sniff*
    (... and Dom points out the irony of two students from Hunter College chaining themselves to the front doors of the Diocese of Rockville chancery to protest a church-authorized deer hunt. Crazy amusing stuff.)

    Monday, November 13, 2006

    Does the Church of England support Infant Euthanasia or not?

    The U.K. Daily Mail (and other outlets) has been receiving much attention for this story:

    Outrage as Church backs calls for severely disabled babies to be killed at birth

    The Church of England has broken with tradition dogma by calling for doctors to be allowed to let sick newborn babies die.

    Christians have long argued that life should preserved at all costs - but a bishop representing the national church has now sparked controversy by arguing that there are occasions when it is compassionate to leave a severely disabled child to die.

    And the Bishop of Southwark, Tom Butler, who is the vice chair of the Church of England's Mission and Public Affairs Council, has also argued that the high financial cost of keeping desperately ill babies alive should be a factor in life or death decisions.
    The shock new policy from the church has caused outrage among the disabled.

    But LifeSiteNews is on the job:

    Church of England Does Not Support Infant Euthanasia

    The Church of England's decision to support a policy of withholding or withdrawing medical treatment from very premature or disabled newborns was not a statement of support for infant euthanasia, pro-life leaders have clarified, after media reports, notably The Sunday Times- Britain, said the church was calling for legal euthanasia.

    In a statement made to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics inquiry into treatment of premature babies, the Rt. Rev. Tom Butler, Bishop of Southwark and vice chair of public affairs of the Mission and Public Affairs Council, wrote, "[I]t may in some circumstances be right to choose to withhold or withdraw treatment, knowing it will possibly, probably, or even certainly result in death."

    Although the church could not accept the argument that the life of any baby was not worth living, the submission stated, the church nonetheless felt there were "strong proportionate reasons" for "overriding the presupposition that life should be maintained" at all cost.

    "There may be occasions where, for a Christian, compassion will override the 'rule' that life should inevitably be preserved."

    Wesley J. Smith, U.S. lawyer and leading opponent to the international pro-euthanasia movement, said inaccurate media coverage of the church's statement implied the church was supporting euthanasia, when in fact "it appears that the Church has ratified the right to withdraw life-sustaining treatment in some circumstances, which is a different matter altogether."

    Now, these are fine distinctions. And many of us are probably prone to automatically think the worst of the Anglican Church. However, in this situation, it appears that the media has greatly distorted and conflated matters. Take a breath, everyone, and save the shouting for when it's needed - because you know it will be.

    Update: Not surprisingly there has been alot of comments made below about what the CofE thinks are "legitimate" circumstances for withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from newborns. I'd like to make a couple important clarifications:

    1) The CofE did not call for severely disabled babies 'to be [actively] killed at birth.' The MSM was attempting to put the CofE and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on the same side of this issue (since the RCOG did call for active euthanasia). The MSM was wrong.

    2) The separate question of whether the CofE in fact supports a form of "euthanasia by omission" can now be addressed.

    If you go to their website, the CofE has published a "Response to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics' consultation on the ethics of prolonging life in fetuses and the newborn" (by Bishop Tom Butler of Southwark) from which I quote the opening note:

    • "The Church of England's submission to the Nuffield Inquiry is entirely in keeping with the Church's policy on treatment at the beginning and end of life (see Euthanasia and Suicide)
    • The submission stated that fetuses and newborns should only have treatment withheld or withdrawn if treatment is futile.
    • We believe firmly that every life is valued and loved by God equally."

    The second bullet point seems to be in agreement with the Magisterium's teaching that extraordinary means of life support are not necessary (obligatory). Futile treatments may be legitimately withdrawn if they are truly futile.

    I don't have any more time at present to read and comment on the entire statement released by the CofE (busy school day), and I'm not ruling out the possibility that the CofE uses ambiguous and hazy language elsewhere in the statement. However, if the second bullet point is observed, most cases of euthanasia by omission should be ruled out. At least, that's how I read it.

    Update 2: Cardinals respond to the british euthanasia for disabled newborns debate

    [Photo: UK Daily Mail]

    LifeSiteNews highlights, Nov. 13th

    LifeSiteNews:

    "Birth Control Patch - 1,000 Claimants and counting."

    From No Room for Contraception (always room for love):

    "According to Johnson & Johnson's third quarter SEC filing for 2006, there are over '1,000 claimants who have filed lawsuits or have made claims regarding injuries allegedly due to Ortho Evra.' "

    "Serious health problems have been associated with Ortho Evra including fatal and non-fatal blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, and death. From April 2002 to December 2004, over 27,974 'adverse effects' were reported by users of Ortho Evra. Many of the complaints are serious, and the patch is alleged to be responsible for over 23 deaths, including the death of 14 year old Alycia Brown."

    "It's interesting to find out that the FDA, 'big pharma', and medical professionals consider non-fatal and fatal blood clots as 'acceptable risks' of oral contraception.... One has to wonder how many women have been told by their OB/GYNs that their potential death from a fatal blood clot is an 'acceptable risk' of using hormone based contraceptives?" said Ruben Obregon, President of the No Room for Contraception Campaign.

    Read the rest of the story here.

    NRFC has also recently started a blog.

    Indult and Milingo to get special meeting devoted to them by Benedict, Curia

    CWNews:

    Pope Benedict XVI will gather the leaders of the Roman Curia for a meeting on November 16, to discuss critical questions including the bid for broader use of the traditional Latin Mass.

    According to the Italian ANSA news agency, the items for discussion will also include the case of Archbishop Emmanuel Milingo, who was excommunicated in September; and the call to ordain some married men as priests.

    So Thursday will be a busy day, maybe some reports on the meeting will be available by Friday.

    Update: Now it is looking like Milingo is the only issue on the agenda ... quel surprise.

    Update 2: From the VIS...
    "The Holy Father has called a meeting of the heads of dicasteries of theRoman Curia, for Thursday, November 16, in order to examine the situationthat has arisen following the disobedience of Archbishop Emmanuel Milingo,and to reflect upon requests for dispensation from the obligation ofcelibacy and requests for readmission to the priestly ministry, presented bymarried priests over the course of recent years. No other matters arescheduled on the order of the day."
    Update 3: Dom adds his commentary.

    Photos: Protesters at the USCCB meeting in Baltimore

    The Women's Ordination Conference got some special camera coverage today:

    "Janice Sevre-Duszynska of Lexington, Ky., from the Women's Ordination Conference, protests the Catholic church's exclusion of women priests.(AP Photo/ Steve Ruark)"

    ... can't you feel the pathos?

    "Nidaza Vazquez, left, and Aisha Taylor, both of Alexandria, Va. members of the Women's Ordination Conference, take a symbolic Communion in protest of the Catholic Church's exclusion of women as priests. (AP Photo/ Steve Ruark)"

    ... nothing says "I want to promote the sacred in the Catholic Church" like munching a ritz cracker and sipping some grape juice on a street corner.

    Bishops in Baltimore: AmP coverage

    The American bishops are meeting in Baltimore this week, and most of the attention is going to be focused on three documents they are discussing: one on natural family planning, another on the reception of communion, and the third on ministry to homosexuals.

    Amy Welborn has some comments on the addresses of Skylstad (president of the USCCB) and Sambi (the apostolic nuncio) here. She also lets us know that the public sessions are being aired on EWTN here (schedule here).

    Rocco has posted his comments on the opening Mass, which was held in the newly-restored Baltimore basilica.

    Some mainstream news sources, not surprisingly, already know what the bishops will decide this week, but are still showing some restraint in how they present the situation to their readers:

    While continuing to stress that same-sex relationships are immoral, America's Roman Catholic bishops may approve new guidelines this week that absolve gay Catholics of any obligation to try to alter their sexual orientation.

    The guidelines for ministering to homosexuals, to be reviewed when bishops convene Monday in Baltimore for their annual fall meeting, also will urge clergy to baptize the adopted children of gay couples who agree to raise them Catholic.

    ... The bishops also plan to remind parishioners how to prepare themselves for Communion, laying a foundation that would make it easier for clergy to deny the sacrament to Catholics at odds with the church, including politicians. - Chicago Tribune

    And really, the Tribune has such inspired coverage that I can't resist quoting more of it:

    Missing from the meeting's agenda is any mention of the war in Iraq, an absence that irks parishioners who believe the bishops should focus on that issue rather than homosexuality.

    "We hate to see our moral teachers squandering their moral teaching authority when there are important issues they should be dealing with--poverty and social justice and the war," said Sam Sinnett, president of Dignity USA, the nation's largest gay Catholic organization."

    They're much more concerned with whether two homosexuals are going to get married or not," he said. "They've lost focus on the needs of the human race."
    The rest is about par for the course. Many more quotes from Sinnet, for instance.

    Update: CWNews has a bit more information here.

    Update 2: Amy has an extended post overviewing this morning's discussions. Some highlights:

    Iraq: "... retired Archbishop Hannan stood up and spoke about the threat of terrorism, with no specific suggestion, but more of a reflection on how the military personnel he knew in Iraq said an immediate withdrawal (more or less the theme of the document) would be disastrous."

    [Homosexuals & receiving communion]: "...Bishop Curtiss of Omaha was insistent that a media storm was going to break out when it was released and that the bishops really needed help from the committee to deal with it. Could they be sent "sound bits" to help explain it?

    Bishop Serratelli responded that the document was actually pretty thorough in presenting its own justifications." [More on this discussion ...]

    Many more interesting details than I can copy out here. Go read her post if you are interested.

    The press conference sounds to me like a catalogue of missed opportunities. I wish bishops with a little quick thinking and conviction would be willing to expose leading/uninformed/biased questions when they are asked.

    Update 3: Whispers has a second post up, but unfortunately he mostly talks about himself and his blog so it's light on the actual coverage. Amy, in the meantime, links to this page where the bishops' statements/addresses & press releases will be made available.

    I wish my school allowed streaming video else I'd be able to watch the EWTN internet feed during the day. Tuesday morning, 9-12am EST and then Tuesday afternoon, 2-5pm EST are the next broadcast times. You can read the schedule here.

    "Islamic hackers again fail to disrupt Vatican web site" - CWNews

    For some reason this event really amuses me:

    For the second time in as many months, computer hackers affiliated with a radical Islamic group tried and failed to penetrate the Vatican web site, the Italian AGI news service reports.

    Islamic militants who identified themselves as "leaders of the electronic jihad" announced on their own internet sites that they would launch a "large-scale battle" against the Vatican site this week, in response to what they saw as insults against Islam by Pope Benedict XVI. The exact form of the attack was not explained.

    According to the AGI news story, an attack was launched on November 9, but thwarted by security measures on the Vatican site. A similar effort to disrupt the Vatican internet site was made in October-- again without any significant effect.

    The Vatican web site -- one of the busiest on the internet-- has tight security measures in place, informed sources say. And Vatican computer-security personnel had ample warning of the Islamic hackers' plans. [CWNews]

    I guess what really gets me is the (somewhat prejudiced) image I have in my mind of a bunch of radical Islamic men huddled around a dilapidated computer in the middle of a desert proclaiming themselves the "leaders of the electronic jihad." Well, they're not much of a challenge for Michael, it seems.

    The scary thing is, of course, that they would probably attack Vatican.va without the ".va" if they had the means at their disposal.

    Papist news highlights, Monday Nov. 13

    Pro-choice, anti-Pope editor of diocesan newspaper out of a job

    Via Curt Jester:

    Gerald posts on update on a story he covered before.

    You may remember Maia Nolan, pro-choice, anti-Pope editor of the Anchorage diocesan paper. Looks like she's out of a job. JD sent me this ad from Catholic News Service

    The ad for a new editor included:

    The requirements for this position include: excellent verbal and written
    communication skills; practicing Catholic and in union with the magisterial teachings of the Catholic Church

    AmP schadenfreude meter: 8.3

    Your PPOTD! - Monday, Nov. 13

    "And here, Holy Father, are the secret identities, locations and assignments of the Male Association of Sacred Samurai* (M.A.S.S.)"
    No, seriously, this is what they talked about - it was important.
    *"The word 'samurai' is derived from the archaic Japanese verb 'samorau', changed to 'saburau' , meaning 'to serve'; a samurai is the servant of a lord." [source]
    [photo credit: AP Photo/L'Osservatore Romano]

    Sunday, November 12, 2006

    Truly, life is Stranger than Fiction (AmP movie review)

    This weekend I went to see Stranger than Fiction. It features Will Ferrell in an unlikely dramatic lead, Dustin Hoffman as the teacher of literary criticism that Ferrell goes to for help, and Emma Thompson as the reclusive genius who, it turns out, is writing the story of Ferrell's life. I enjoyed the movie and want to take a look at what I think it is trying to say. Granted, I have my papist glasses on (I rarely take them off because I think they help me see better), but I think what I discovered in the movie really is there.

    *Spoiler warning* I’m going to give away plot details in this essay - it is the only way to make my points. So, read on if you have seen it, but if you have not seen it, be warned that you will probably lose the ability to see the movie with fresh eyes. Alternately, you might be able to see how well my claims hold up under close viewing.

    Since the movie requires so many suspensions of belief and outlandish presuppositions, one can not expect very much plot integrity from it, rather, it is the movie’s message that stands out all the more clear: I think the central theme of Stranger than Fiction is "the plan" for Ferrell’s life as envisioned and created by Thompson, and lived (and chosen) by Ferrell. Thompson is a God-like character who controls the events in the movie (albeit only to a point), and Ferrell’s life and circumstances are her creation. It is the old tension between fate and free-will. And I think in the end the issue is treated rather brilliantly.

    Ferrell begins the movie living out Thompson's plan for his life completely ignorant that there is a plan at all. He works for the IRS, deals entirely in numbers and reduces human life to numbers (none too subtlety portrayed by the cute CG overlays during the opening credits and throughout much of the movie). He counts his brush strokes in the morning instead of trying to remember his dreams (if he has any).

    Out of the blue, then, he hears Thompson's voice narrating the most intimate details of his morning routine. His life is immediately turned upside-down with the realization that he is not alone and that there is someone else involved in his existence. This someone knows who Ferrell better than he knows himself, and knows his future while he, on the other hand, has never bothered to think about it.

    When Ferrell realizes that he is following a plan which has been set out for him by Thompson, he initially tries to cease living at all. And yet the plan comes for him when he tries to hide away in his home (breaking into his living room with a wrecking crane as it turns out).

    Next, he tries to break away from the plan by doing something different. He radically changes his life, even improves it, by learning the guitar (his childhood dream that he let slip away), and pursuing the (implausibly-friendly) Ana, the first love of his life. But even in these developments, Ferrell is actually still following the plan. Only now he is doing it out of his desires and not a blind (fatalistic) submission. He is no longer in the realm of numbers, but in the realm of cookies and relationships, but he is still in the plan.

    So far, the situation is uneasy but at least looking up for Ferrell. No longer an automaton, he has enriched his life and found a new and wonderful existence he never knew before. But now comes the hard part: the plan requires that he die. We find out that every one of Thompson's previous books is a tragedy, and we all know that heroes die in tragedies. Ferrell, of course, does not like this discovery at all ("it's such bad timing!"), and succeeds in to searching Thompson out, confronting her, and demanding to read the ending of his life as she has written it.

    Ferrell manages to read the script and foresee the ending for his life … and then, amazingly, he accepts it. When he hands the script back to Thompson, he is not accepting the end of his life because his story is good fiction, he is accepting it because it is good life. It should be remembered that Ferrel has just had a conversation with Hoffman where it is impressed upon him that everyone has to die; it is only a matter of where and when. That said, how should one die? What should one die for?

    Thompson's plan involves Ferrell saving the life of a small boy. And when Ferrel walks up to the curb in front of the bus stop, he really has chosen to be there and save that boy's life. He did not have to get out of bed that morning. And yet he did, and that is the plan. In the end, his death is 100% his choice, and 100% Thompson's plan.

    If one misses this point that Ferrell's choice to show up at the curb is truly free, one might be tempted to accuse the movie of fatalism. However, Ferrell's knowledge of what will happen does not rule out his actions still being his own. Rather, he has embraced an opportunity to sacrifice his life in a more noble way than any other he can envision. In essence, he cooperates with a beautiful and proper foreordaining of events.

    The movie takes its point one step further. Thompson, who has only written tragedies because they are the best fiction she can compose, breaks down at the last moment and rewrites Ferrell's story. His survival is really more of a resurrection - he is saved on the very brink of death (literally, halfway through the word "dead"), albeit ruffled by the experience.

    But why is he saved? Because he is the first character in any of Thompson's stories to choose the death laid out for him, as opposed to her previous characters who have all had death forced upon them. To paraphrase Thompson's words in the movie: "a man who would give up his life - wouldn't that be the kind of man you'd want to live?"

    In a superabundance of grace, Thompson gives back Ferrell his life because he has chosen to give it up. Tragedy becomes comedy. And there is the message: knowing the plan of your life does not impoverish your ability to make choices, rather, as long as you act for the good (saving the boy’s life, providing for Ana's future), knowing the plan actually helps you to make the best choices. And as we know it, that is part of the plan as well. No rewrites needed.

    Truly, life is stranger than fiction, and often better.