The important things

AMP NEWS: My YouTube video of the week's top stories, humorously presented from a Catholic perspective!

archives of the funny

Caption of the Day

website of the month

CatholicVote.com

 book of the month

Render Unto Caesar

CD of the month

St. Michael's Christmas

 Pa•pist: n. A Catholic who is a strong advocate of the papacy.

 

 "Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them." - Ephesians 5:11

AmP 2.0 features

recent posts

 

comments

AmP videos

twitter

AddThis Feed Button

facebook

subscribe

AddThis Feed Button

bookmark

 

email updates


AmP Countdown: Time left to vote for me ("Thomas Peters") in the 2008 Student Blogging Contest: 2008-11-20 23:59:59 GMT-05:00


Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Background: Abp. Wuerl responds to Pelosi's non-apology

After a bit of background clarification, it appears that Washington DC Archbishop Donald Wuerl, when asked by Bob Cusack of The Hill, has responded to Pelosi's non-apology which she issued yesterday through her spokesman.
The initial version of the report from The Hill left it unclear whether Abp. Wuerl was responding to Pelosi's first comments aired on Meet the Press (8/24), or her follow-up statement issued through the spokesman (8/26). The current version of the story claims Abp. Wuerl has in fact responded to both Pelosi's 8/24 and 8/26 statements.

The quoted second response from Abp. Wuerl, in its immediate context:

The public feud over abortion between the Speaker of the House and the archbishop of Washington intensified Tuesday as Rep. Nancy Pelosi responded to his recent criticism and the archbishop fired another salvo at the California Democrat.

The latest development came Tuesday evening, when Washington Archbishop Donald Wuerl issued a statement to The Hill that brushed aside Pelosi’s explanation of her comments about conception on Sunday’s edition of “Meet the Press.”

... Wuerl swiftly denounced Pelosi’s statement, saying, “As the Catechism and early Church documents make clear, abortion is always an evil. That is an unchanging teaching. The question on when the soul enters the body was a philosophical question that grew out of a lack of scientific data at the time of St. Augustine. We have the data today which shows the embryo is human. There no longer is any discussion of whether the unborn is human and so the philosophical discussion of St. Augustine’s time is not relevant today.” (The Hill)

Labels: , , , ,

|

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home